Tag Archives: Paul

Maybe Egon was right

Janine Melnitz: I bet you like to read a lot, too.
Dr. Egon Spengler: Print is dead.

Although I crushed hard on Egon back in the day (oh let’s face it, I still do), his dismissal of the printed word always lost me. What did that mean, anyway? I loved to read, and so did almost everyone I knew, and didn’t scientists have to read a lot? The joke went over my 11-year-old head, but I did start considering what it might be like to collect spores, mold, and fungus.

Now that Dr. Spengler’s statement is even more apt today, I’m also finding lately that my usual voracious appetite for books has waned alarmingly. Besides the usual collection of books I’ve had for years and haven’t gotten around to — you have one too, right? — I have a stack of new books I really want to read, and just don’t have the motivation to pick up right now. Richard Dawkins and Terry Pratchett are sitting around on my bedside table, wondering why they aren’t getting any action. So to speak.

As far as nonfiction goes, these days I do so much reading about science and skepticism online (not to mention writing and editing) that it’s almost like a job, or more accurately like throwing myself into a degree program. Every day I decide “this is the day I start The Demon-Haunted World” is also a day where I end up reading pages and pages of skeptical news and blogs. The Internet is a distraction, yes, but I don’t feel like I’m wasting my time as I’m learning immense amounts, and loving it. But there’s only so much I can study anymore — that capacity got nerfed as well — so instead of kicking back with Carl when I take a break from the net, I go looking for escapism.

So why don’t I pick up that novel instead, and vanish into some excellent storytelling? Because I’m finding it elsewhere at the moment. I’ve waxed rhapsodic about Dragon Age: Origins previously, and since then I’ve also restarted Mass Effect. Bioware, the company that makes these games, is renowned for the world-building, character development, and storytelling that goes into them. Ferelden and the Systems Alliance are brought to incredibly vivid life with masterful voice acting and compelling plots, and while the games change depending on your actions, they are no mere choose-your-own-adventures. Little moments, like Alistair interrupting an important scene to wonder why I never told him I’d been betrothed once (awkward!), or an assassin smoothly slipping out of the shot when Shepard is on TV, truly allow you to feel that you’re not just plugging into a predetermined pathway, but that your words, actions, and relationships have true consequences in the world. And the codices! Between DA and ME, there’s a novel’s worth of reading I have yet to do right there.

The games aren’t distracting me from reading purely because I’m spending my free time on them, but rather because they deeply satisfy my craving for great storytelling. And if it weren’t for the games, I’d still have these comics that are so ridiculously good, they achieve the same thing. I was never much for them, especially the superhero genre, but in college I had to read Maus for a freshman lit class, and my views on graphic novels were blown all to hell. Later, my friend Teena, who used to work for Dark Horse Comics, pushed The Dark Knight into my hands and said “Just read it.” She was my official Comics Arbiter until Paul took over that position, and I credit them both with igniting my interest.

I have picky and eclectic tastes in comics. I love both Persepolis and Owly, and I especially get a kick out of stories that turn the superhero genre on its ear. For example, I can’t get enough of The Boys, which surprised the hell out of someone once who told me “I didn’t think girls read that one.” Yeah, it’s off-the-charts raunchy, violent, and offensive, but hilariously so, and the characters leap right off the page out of a story that just keeps getting deeper and twistier. On the other end of the spectrum, I recently read the entire four-issue run of Beasts of Burden, as well as the anthology stories that are available online. It’s sort of like Buffy the Vampire Slayer as enacted by anthropomorphized neighborhood pets; a seemingly over-cute concept, but in fact it has beautiful art, compelling characters, and stories that — well, I don’t want to give anything away, but I’m not sure I’ll ever forget issue #2 (“Lost”).

As a lifelong lover of books, I can’t help feeling guilty that I’m getting the goods elsewhere, but I also realize how silly this is when there’s so much good fiction and nonfiction in other media. However, Mort isn’t going to go unread forever, nor is The Selfish Gene. I’ll get back to all those shiny, delicious-smelling pages soon. Print isn’t dead to me…for now, it’s just taking a little nap.

(Yes, I know this is the second blog post in as many weeks to reference Ghostbusters. Back off, man — I’m a skeptic.)

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Weekend sendoff: Only connect

This week, Skepchick asked the question “what kind of skeptic are you?” This question comes at an interesting time for me, but has been apt for quite a while. I’m often frustrated by my lack of capacity to do more with my interest in skepticism. Being as ravenous as I am to learn more about it, I feel I’m missing out on a lot of cool events that take place in Southern California’s robust skeptical community. (Of course, back when I was healthy, I was working and going to school, and didn’t have the time to do much more than attend a Skeptic Society conference.)

Surly Amy, Surly Johnny, carr2d2 & Tim3P0 listen to Brian Hart of

Surly Amy, Surly Johnny, carr2d2, and Tim3P0 listen to Brian Hart of the Greater L.A. Skeptics Meetup Group (not pictured)

Last week I had the great pleasure to enjoy some delicious shabu shabu and some even more delicious skeptical banter with an awesome group of people. It reminded me that, per Monday’s post, I really need to damn the torpedoes and go full speed ahead a little more frequently than I do now, because it’s just too much fun to be around like-minded people who also love to talk about this stuff. I’m lucky that Paul is also a skeptic — he comes to it from his engineering background and love of magic — so we can go to events together which makes it easier on me physically, not to mention how great it is to have a partner who shares my enthusiasm!

Of course I will still be blogging about skepticism (among the usual other things) here, and in February I will be returning to Skeptically Speaking‘s “Speaking Up” segment. I’m also very happy to mention that I’ve joined the team at Grassroots Skeptics as its editorial manager — doesn’t that sound fancy? — so I get to scratch that itch to volunteer my time for a cause I believe in.

I’m looking forward to upping the “active” quotient of my skepticism this year by continuing to connect and work with passionate and talented people, both online and offline. To illustrate the point, I send you off with a comic from the community favorite Tree Lobsters! by Steve DeGroof, whom I met during a Virtual Drinking Skeptically chat. I was in on I believe the first Twitter chat about confectionopathy, a treatment I am seriously considering. And by the way, Tree Lobsters! is running a fundraiser right now to benefit Engineers Without Borders.

sweet

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Weekend sendoff: Lessons for a skeptic

straitOne thing I love about the skeptic community is that there is no end of things to learn from it. In one sense, I mean that there are so many different things to focus on, from medical pseudoscience to cryptozoology to Holocaust denial, and so much learning material about them — podcasts, blogs, books, lectures on YouTube, etc. (As someone who mostly works from bed, I am really thankful for how much of this is readily available on the Internet.) In another sense, and especially for someone who has only just started writing about her skepticism, there is always something new to learn about critical thinking, and how to improve it. It seems to me that criticism of one another can be just as useful as criticism of those we consider “the enemy,” at least as far as encouraging the community to improve its own practices.

I should properly cite and link some of what follows, but it was Paul’s birthday yesterday and I chose to celebrate with him instead of writing a really cogent post. The nutshell for those who haven’t been keeping up, and who will hopefully not mind Googling if they want to read for themselves: James Randi, a beloved and esteemed skeptical leader, wrote a post in which he expressed doubt about the existence of anthropogenic (human-caused) global warming (AGW). There was a firestorm of reaction to both this and his follow-up post, in which other skeptical leaders expressed disappointment, betrayal, and even anger. Some of this reaction had to do with the logical fallacies and apparent lack of critical study on the matter; some with the notion that the AGW “denialists” — an epithet hurled by many commenters at Randi — have had their position bolstered by one of the true icons of the skeptical movement.

There has been much opining, and I don’t need to add my voice to the chorus. The reason I mention it is because I’ve found it all to be extremely educational. I’ve learned a lot from those who have picked apart Randi’s post to demonstrate its fallacies. In a different way, I’ve learned a lot from the different personal views espoused by commenters such as PZ Myers, Phil Plait, Orac, and Massimo Pigliucci. It seems to me, and I mean this without judgment on anyone’s reaction, that skeptical leaders have a lot to teach their students when a challenge in the community arises like this. What is the purview of skepticism, and what isn’t? Should notable skeptics be restricted only to their area of expertise, or are they just as entitled as anyone else to air their opinion, controversial as it may be? When the community is forced to debunk one of its own leaders, certainly students like me should work even harder, learn even more, to guard against the kind of thinking that we like to think we are immune from. Because this week it really hit home that none of us is. And this is also how we form our opinions about how skeptics do and should respond in these situations.

Along those lines, I’ll have my belated post about alternative medicine for CFS and similar illnesses on Monday. Or more accurately, alternatives to some of the best known, but least useful, “alternative” treatments. For now, as a total non-sequitur, I send you off with the birthday boy and the incomparable Zen.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon