Tag Archives: homeopathy

Weekend sendoff: skeptical yummies

There were a few things this week that made me a happy skeptic. What say we check them out?

On Monday, the U.K.’s Science and Technology Select Committee delivered a death blow to homeopathy by releasing a report that concludes the National Health Service should not fund it, nor should the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) continue to license homeopathic products. I don’t normally get this type of news outside of the skeptical community, but this time I had all kinds of people sending me links to the story. (Thanks, everyone!) I like this summation by Martin Robbins, who is part of the 10:23 campaign. I look forward to potential ripple effects as other governments and medical agencies reconsider the role of homeopathy in healthcare. Which is to say, it hasn’t got one.

I was also very gratified to see a Science-Based Medicine column by Dr. Harriet Hall, the SkepDoc, about the CFS-XMRV situation. I had written to her asking whether she might look into it, and I appreciate her take on it. Naturally it doesn’t come without controversy — for example, she defends Dr. Wallace Sampson in the comments, whose column about CFS leaves a great deal to be desired — but I love seeing caution urged on this matter in a reasonable way by a respected scientist. At this point I no longer have any hope that the CFIDS Association of America is going to provide this for us; they seem to have no interest in reminding patients how science works. These are patients who, for example, believe that getting tested for XMRV is going to contribute to the body of scientific knowledge about it. And as a response, the CAA provides yet more articles, webinars, and interviews about XMRV. Not helpful.

Lastly, registration for The Amazing Meeting 8 in Las Vegas opened today. This is, as others have said, the “Woodstock for skeptics” and I am over-the-moon excited that Paul and I will be attending this year. It takes place pretty close to the first anniversary of this blog, and I can think of no better way to celebrate. I can’t wait to meet everyone — if you’re going, be sure to say hi to the gal with the rainbow cane!

I send you off with something maybe not as fun as a musical number, but more thematically appropriate: an excerpt of Dr. Hall at last year’s TAM 7, speaking about vaccines.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Weekend sendoff: An impending overdose

I give homeopathy a hard time on this blog, but that’s nothing compared to what the 10:23 campaign is up to on Saturday. Several hundred people will be taking an orchestrated overdose of homeopathic pills in order to prove that there is nothing to them. You can read the New Scientist article about it as well, or simply Google “10:23 campaign” for even more information.

I’ve actually been out and about this week so I don’t have a lot of blogging mojo right now. But things are good, and so to fit that mood I send you off with a version of Journey’s “Don’t Stop Believin’” that I think blows the Glee version out of the water. Thanks to Heidi Anderson for the link!

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Alternatives to the alternative

pillsChronically ill skeptics will probably find themselves disappointed if they go looking for critical thinking about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) on online support forums. This is a thesis I keep returning to because it cropped up again for me recently. I decided to leave one community because of a thread in their CAM subforum (not one in which I was involved). A link to a news story in which a child died due to its parents’ reliance on a popular CAM treatment was met with hostility, unwillingness to start another discussion about CAM, and the notion that “it’s a support forum.”

The original post was intended to help answer the question of “what’s the harm” of relying upon certain treatments. From this I infer that “support” only goes as far as saying yes to whatever treatments people decide upon, even if they are at best useless and at worst dangerous. I have a very different definition of support, which starts with understanding both sides of the issue. The person considering the treatment is sick, in pain, and has heard good things about it from people she considers reliable. The person offering the opposite view (as at the website I just linked to) wants to provide facts showing that there are dangers to these therapies. This isn’t done out of spite, but rather with the first person’s welfare at heart. This is a very good form of support. Should we only be providing the pros and never the cons? Does that sound supportive? Not to me.

Like what’stheharm.net, I am not an enemy of CAM on principle, especially because so many of us have these annoyingly intangible illnesses, where conventional medicine often just throws up its hands at a certain point and says “Good luck feeling better.” After five or so years of involvement with online chronic illness communities, I sometimes deviate from the skeptical motto that “anecdotes do not equal evidence.” Are there reliable randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about acupuncture’s use in easing the symptoms of ME/CFS? I’ll go out on a limb without searching and guess there aren’t many. But I’m just not inclined to leap on people who decide to give it a try, as long as they’re well informed about it. (My exception to this is homeopathy. This is nothing more than a sugar pill and should not be promoted by anyone. Now, if someone is completely informed on the subject, and is both willing and able to shell out money for an at-best placebo effect…well, I can’t understand that one, but I guess I support it too.)

The part I protest is where people reject what Western medicine has to offer. By all means, if you can afford it, go hog-wild with the echinacea and vitamin C, as long as you also get the flu vaccine. (With exceptions for people who have legitimate medical problems with it, of course.) Without a doubt, treat your child’s nausea with ginger root, as long as she also gets the chemotherapy she needs. I completely understand and identify with the frustration chronically ill people may develop towards Western medicine, but rejecting it outright isn’t the answer. If the recent science-based XMRV discoveries and new evidence-based studies eventually produce a cure for CFS, what are you going to do then?

If my position sounds wishy-washy, well, it is, to some extent. As I’ve said before, it’s too hard for me to ignore that desperation felt by people who may be sick and in pain for their entire lives, something that I don’t think is always taken into account by enemies of CAM, or even neutral skeptics. This is a really powerful force. This isn’t about fixing something with a vaccine or radiation: this is a lifetime of doctors saying “We don’t know.” People will seek alternative therapies, and it is supportive both to understand and respect why they are doing so, as well as to provide evidence for why they may not want to choose something they’re considering.

Here are a few examples of alternative therapies I have seen suggested for ME/CFS patients, and things I would suggest instead. Of course, these are only suggestions and anything I mention here should certainly be researched by you and discussed with your doctor. Don’t do or stop anything on the basis of this post alone.

drinking-water-to-improve-your-complexion

“Alternative”: Homeopathy

Alternative: Water

I’m completely serious. Homeopathy is based on this idea that water retains the memory of molecules of stuff that was in it once but has now been diluted a whole mess of times so it doesn’t even contain that anymore. Instead of paying for this silliness, just drink more water. Especially when you’re constantly running fevers and have other chronic symptoms of infection, it’s very important to stay hydrated just as though you had an acute infection.

“Alternative”: Graded Exercise Therapy (GET)

Alternative: Find your own ways to exercise

GET is controversial. Some studies have supported it; however, studies tend to exclude severely affected patients. Also, not all studies include reporting of post-exertional malaise, a very common and very significant side effect of exercise for people with CFS. Finally, as it has to be done with a therapist, you’re much better off saving the money and constructing your own exercise program around your own skills and limitations. This post has some very good advice; I particularly like that it includes mental as well as physical exertion. Personally, when I’m feeling up to it, there’s one or two songs on iTunes that I am incapable of not dancing to when I play them, so I dance around like an idiot for a while with the curtains closed. Or I like to play air violin to Tchaikovsky’s violin concerto, which if you’re doing it right is a good 15 minute workout!

“Alternative”: Bikram (“hot”) yoga

Alternative: Easy yoga

Yoga is great for people with CFS. All you need are some beginner’s resources — I like this video — and you will learn breathing techniques and a range of exercises you can use depending on how good a day you’re having, and you can do as much or as little as you want. The idea behind hot or Bikram yoga is one that is very attractive in CAM and especially with quacks: removing toxins from the body. Another ME/CFS forum I took one look at and left supported the idea of chelation, which is most often touted as a treatment for autism. Besides the fact that there’s not much need to worry about “flushing toxins,” the high temperatures at which Bikram yoga is practiced should be an automatic warning sign for people with CFS and many other illnesses that affect thermoregulation. Take five, 10, 15 minutes a day to do some yoga poses in your bedroom, but forget about the sweat. And on that note…

“Alternative”: Master Cleanse (and the like)

Alternative: Limited juice fast

The Master Cleanse and other detoxification programs also appeal to this fear that we are ill because we are full of toxins. They are a fairly useless strain on the body; you would do much better to simply eat right and drink a lot of water. That said, short (three-day) juice fasts including snacks of crackers and brown rice, after a doctor’s consultation, can have a certain psychological benefit, like breaking bad eating habits. But in general, our bodies are too stressed out as it is with all the windmills our immune systems are tilting at, and deliberately upsetting the balance by fasting instead of eating healthily just isn’t a great idea.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon