Tag Archives: Cats

Weekend sendoff: I’m too lucky

Because for the most part I’m surrounded, online and off, by people who are accepting and understanding of what’s happened to me, whether or not they even knew me before I got nerfed. And for the most part the silly or ignorant things that are said to me come from well-meaning people who are trying to be kind or polite. So it can be easy for me sometimes to forget that malicious prejudice against invisible illness really exists.

I thought this Skepticblog post by Steven Novella about a controversial treatment for MS was very interesting. For one thing, it reminded me of CFS “specialists” such as electrical engineer Trevor Marshall, who somehow manage to be the only person to discover a miracle treatment. In the case of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) in MS patients, the specialist is at least a physician, but that doesn’t necessarily make his setup any more legitimate.

I feel empathy for MS patients who are anxious to learn about a potential new treatment or even cure, but I also feel a sense of recognition with the potentially (or likely, according to Novella) premature clamor for this treatment. It’s very similar to the CFS patients who are getting themselves tested for XMRV — a test that is still not covered by insurance, but is in at least one case administered by a lab with connections to the institute that did the original study — or even treated with antiretroviral medication.

The part where I’m lucky comes in where I commented briefly as much on the post, which was met by two ugly responses by someone who can generously be called a troll. Yes, I do recognize that behavior, which according to the rules of the Internet mean I shouldn’t be upset by it. And I should deplore the outpouring of scathing responses as “feeding the troll” rather than taking delight and satisfaction in them. Yes, I was being a thin-skinned noob.

But what bothers me isn’t this particular person, really. It’s the general reminder of how people with chronic and mostly invisible illnesses are actually viewed in many cases. “There’s no evidence,” the troll snarked, because mostly we don’t look sick. As stupid as that sounds, and as obviously as this doucheturkey just wanted to garner attention, it is the reality for many patients much less fortunate than I am. When you hear of someone with CFS saying she wished she had cancer instead, it may sound shocking, but I can’t say I blame her.

Now that I’ve bummed you all out, I’ll send you off with what may be the best video ever. EVER. Paul sent this to me a couple of days ago and I cannot stop watching it. EVER. Prepare to die of cute, and then have a great weekend.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Weekend sendoff: But You Don’t Look Spammy

I’ve alluded previously to the resistance of chronic illness forums and communities to thinking skeptically or critically about treatments and medications. In the past I haven’t named any of them, because it’s not necessarily the fault of the forum posters who get positive benefits from those forums; often it’s the moderators.

I wrote my post about recognizing a quack and then decided to go back to butyoudontlooksick.com, the forum to which I was referring in my earlier post. Although I left that community for the reasons I’ve explained, my genuine desire to share what I think is a vital skill for chronically ill and disabled people got the better of me, and I started a thread including my post. The thread got some interesting  responses and I was looking forward to continuing the discussion.

Then it got locked “due to spam,” and when I privately contacted the appropriate moderator for clarification, I was ignored. Let me be clear that the rest of what I’m about to say is not directed at the forum posters and their positive contributions.

I’ve been thinking a lot about my topic of “Compassionate Skepticism,” which I proposed as a TAM paper and will be writing about more in a week or so. It’s about how skeptics can hopefully shift some of their assumptions and presumptions when dealing with people who have constant, chronic physical pain and cognitive dysfunction.

But you know what? Skeptics need to be met halfway. And this behavior is just half-assed. This is exactly why many skeptics simply write off those people as stupid. I don’t believe that to be true, but I can’t say I find this action particularly bright. To me it simply backs up my previous assertion that the moderators foster a warm ‘n’ fuzzy closed circle that excludes the controversial, even if that information could save someone’s life. As mentioned in my older post, previously that “controversy” was someone posting an article reporting the plain facts of a girl who died from eczema because her homeopath father wouldn’t treat her with conventional medicine. And now my attempt to encourage sick people to think critically is labelled spam, without even a word of explanation to me.

The last thing I wrote here was wondering whether I’m just preaching to the converted. Certainly getting called a spammer in return for reaching out in a friendly way to the possibly unconverted doesn’t improve my optimism on that score. I am really glad that at least a couple of people seemed to find the blog post beneficial. Obviously I’m not going to shut up here, or elsewhere. But I truly am done with that site altogether at this point. Management’s motto seems to be “Let’s pat each other on the head but never ever use that head.” And my apologies to all the forum members to whom none of this applies…but I can’t stomach it.

UPDATE: The thread has now been unlocked.

In other, much happier news, I am now a staff writer for AbleGamers. This is a website of the AbleGamers Foundation, whose mission is “to empower the disabled population to enjoy the digital revolution that is taking place in gaming.” The very first time I read those words, only a couple of months ago, I immediately knew I wanted to be involved somehow. You can read and/or listen to a great NPR interview to learn more, and you can also read my first story for the site. It’s not an easy road for them, as developers are far more interested in creating the next technological blockbuster than in adapting that blockbuster for a marginalized population. But as part of that population, I share the foundation’s optimism that positive changes can and will come.

That, by the way, accounts for this week’s missing blog post. In other news, last week Paul and I fostered a kitty and never let it be said I missed an opportunity to post cat photos. I won’t go into the circumstances as they’re kind of depressing and a lot of you already know about it anyway, but in the end we were able to save the life of an elder but wonderful cat, and transport her to another safe and loving foster home. If you should know anyone accessible to San Diego who might wish to provide a calm forever home for this lovely lady, please contact me. I send you off with Wynne (renamed by us, obviously):

Fourteen years old and so beautiful.

Like all Burmese, she loves exploring...

...and affection.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Weekend sendoff: Fairly superstitious

I huff and puff a lot about the necessity of critical thinking, but it’s not because I have mastered the art of skepticism and am offering my pearls of wisdom from on high. Far from it. Unlike Jenny McCarthy, I have not yet earned my degree from Google University. I’m more like a second-grader who’s just gaining enough confidence to raise her hand in class sometimes. I’m learning every day, which is a great process but as someone once said, the more you learn, the more you realize you don’t know.

I was raised by wolves two skeptics, so the irrational beliefs and behaviors I’ve acquired over the years have not, on the whole, been too difficult to discard. With one exception: I never really absorbed the religious aspect of Judaism, but some of  the cultural superstitions did take hold. I was like a kid who resents having to go to temple, because I realized even then that I was going to grow up believing in something I didn’t want to. And that’s exactly what happened. Now, I figure if I’m going to give people grief for irrational behavior, it’s only fair that I examine my own.

(Also as a kid, I thought that Stevie Wonder was singing “fairly” instead of “very superstitious,” which made the song a little confusing.)

I’m going to talk about this for a little bit on Skeptically Speaking tonight, to which you can listen live here at 5pm Pacific time, or get from the website usually by Sunday or Monday. The main part of the episode will be about the Independent Investigations Group here in Los Angeles, which is a great group that I am just starting to get involved with. In their words:

The Independent Investigations Group investigates fringe science, paranormal and extraordinary claims from a rational, scientific viewpoint, and disseminates factual information about such inquiries to the public.

How fun is that!

And on that note, I send you off with a mystical cat who is never going to win a $50,000 prize, or any other. Cute though. Sorry I can’t remember where I saw it first, but due credit to whomever.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon