Tag Archives: awareness

Why another “awareness” day?

Today, May 12, is International ME/CFS Awareness Day. And I know what you might be thinking, because I think the same thing sometimes: “Why another awareness day? I’m aware it exists, what’s the big deal?”

ME/CFS (a term encompassing two similar or related illnesses: myalgic encephalopathy and chronic fatigue syndrome) is different from many other conditions that get awareness days and months, walks for the cure, and other support. Not only is it poorly understood and often misdiagnosed in the medical community, being something of a “trashcan diagnosis,” but that lack of understanding is far, far worse among the general public. Patients are still fighting off the terrible moniker of “yuppie flu” with which we’ve been stigmatized for decades, and in some cases they are fighting even to be recognized as ill at all.

Before I go any further, let me be perfectly clear that I am referring here only to issues of awareness. (I would not in a million years try to “one-up” people with other terrible diseases and conditions.) Would you accuse a woman with a malignancy in her breast of “just being lazy?” Or suggest to someone with a spinal cord injury that his inability to walk must be due to clinical depression?

And yet that’s exactly what people with CFS face all the time. In England, for example, there is an ongoing struggle to get the National Health Service to move away from treatments focusing mainly or solely on psychological issues, and to see ME (as it’s mostly called there) as a somatic problem. And there are other countries where ME/CFS is categorized only as a psychiatric disorder! Thankfully, change seems to be coming slowly, but that doesn’t help physically disabled people who have been told for years that cognitive behavioral therapy and antidepressants will cure them. Here in the States we are a bit luckier — that is, if you can find a doctor who knows anything about CFS and what it takes to treat it.

(“Return to the career I loved” was my entry, although I’m sure it was sent in by more than one person.)

Awareness has been raised recently by the publication of a paper suggesting a possible link between a retrovirus called XMRV and people who have ME/CFS. While this has still not yet been proven in any way — there have not yet been any successful replication or corroborative studies — the news did serve to legitimize the illness somewhat, and make it clear that people who have it aren’t just malingerers.

This is the most common perception of people with CFS. Because of the negative stigma of the disease, patients not only have to contend with daily physical symptoms of malaise, cognitive dysfunction, crushing fatigue, fever, pain, and so forth, we also have to deal with people who don’t take us seriously. I’ll be honest: when I see someone complaining about having the flu and how bad it feels, and all the sympathy they receive, sometimes I get annoyed. Not at that person, but simply because people with CFS feel like that every damn day and yet they’re far more likely to hear “But you look great!” and “It can’t be that bad.” Not to mention the classic accusations of laziness.

When I was diagnosed with CFS, I was engaged to be married, finishing my very satisfying and successful grad school work, and about to start on a college teaching career literally custom-made for me, combining my passions for TESOL (teaching English to speakers of other languages) as well as deaf education. I was barrelling through life towards my ambitions as I had for more than 30 years. And now? I had to quit that wonderful job because of my increasing disability. I can’t finish my degree because I no longer have the money or the physical capacity. My extremely modest exercise routine made me so sick I had to ditch it and take half of April to recover. Am I depressed? Hell yes, wouldn’t you be? My mind hasn’t been disabled, and I daily fight the frustration of the physical limitations that effectively put an end to everything I’d been working for my whole life. But this is secondary depression due to the physical disability. I dare any of you to accuse me of simply giving in to laziness.

And I have it so, so much better than many patients. Yes, I lost a friend who appeared to take my increasing inability to hang out with her whenever as a personal affront. (And I’m much better off for that loss.) But my closest, dearest, most important friends have stuck by me, and unlike many patients whose illness destroys their romantic relationship(s), I also have an incredibly loving, supportive, and understanding husband. I have a wonderful support system of online friends as well, who accept me for who I am, including my limitations and liabilities. And I have access to quality medical care, including a GP with a great deal of clinical experience with CFS.

Not everyone is so lucky. Many if not most CFS patients lose friends, partners, and the support of family members who do not understand that their loved one is sick. Without a palpable injury or malignancy, patients are often misdiagnosed by both doctors and laypeople as suffering from clinical depression or even bipolar disorder. Doctors without something to shrink medically or cut out of the body are often at a complete loss, and apt to hurry a patient out of their office with no answers, support, or help of any kind.

This is why awareness is so vital. Without the impetus that non-invisible illnesses gain in terms of research funding as well as patient support, ME/CFS remains a mystery. That is of course its defining trait — we patients are, all of us, medical mysteries — but the fact of its existence, the way to support patients, the need for research funds and scientific attention to be paid, are not mysteries. They are imperatives. I do not deny that the misdiagnosis can go the other way, and people who are in fact suffering from major clinical depression may be wrongly diagnosed as having CFS. But this only emphasizes the need for greater attention and understanding to be directed at ME/CFS. There is a collection of blog posts here if you wish to read more. And if you are moved to donate to some very promising research, please read my previous post. But even more than your dollars, I plead for your awareness and your understanding. Not for myself, but for all the patients out there who aren’t so lucky.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Good news is good

charles-schulz-peanuts-celebrate-the-little-thingsThe amount of writing and interacting I did last week helped push me into a crash, so it seems appropriate to talk about the interesting news that came out around the same time we blew up the moon and President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize.

A study published online last Friday by the journal Science showed a possible link between chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and a retrovirus known as XMRV. The mainstream media, from the Wall Street Journal to the BBC, as well as major scientific organizations like the National Cancer Institute, reported on this story.

Even the small amount of data presented in these stories is enough to make a critical thinker cautious about the study and its implications. The study group was relatively small, and the findings of XMRV in only 67% of CFS patients makes it far from a smoking gun (especially given other retroviruses previously implicated in CFS), or something that warrants immediate treatment. There is also concern on the other hand, as mentioned in the BBC article, that given the disease’s variety among patients, a “smoking gun” theory is flawed to begin with. For more on the science behind this announcement, I recommend this article, and the analysis by England’s National Health Service, both of which discuss the findings with appropriate caution in their conclusions.

But there is something to be happy about here on a larger scale. I can’t remember the last time, and there might not have been one since I got sick, that there was so much mainstream media attention paid to a scientific study focusing on the etiology of CFS. It helps enormously to validate a disease that is still widely thought to be partly or entirely psychological in nature. (Did you notice that the NHS article was categorized under “Mental Health”?) I feel vindicated when the world sees that scientists are not only studying somatic causes, but making progress with their discoveries. From a purely PR standpoint, it’s a great awareness campaign. From a scientific standpoint, a potentially faulty study can inspire further research — and hopefully further research money — and the positive feedback loop continues.

oscar-lgUnless, of course, you are a questionable expert with an eponymous CFS treatment, such as Trevor Marshall, Ph.D. His protocol, which involves the complete elimination of vitamin D from the body in all forms, food and sunshine, is fringe science and rightfully controversial. (From a website question about why the protocol is not more widely used: “Furthermore it is more difficult to obtain acceptance of the Marshall Protocol because, like surgical operations, its efficacy and safety cannot be easily proven with double blind clinical trials.” Caveat emptor.)

Here is Marshall’s response to the news. He begins with some strange logical leaps (just because XMRV was not present in all CFS patients studied doesn’t eliminate all possibility of causality) and expresses concern about the results based on an opinion, but does manage to eke out a self-serving nod of congrats to a colleague. Then suddenly, he gets nasty. His ensuing comments are snippy and condescending, and he also expresses pride at supposedly annoying the editors of a respected journal.

As I’ve mentioned before, people suffering from chronic illness need to think critically at all times, no matter how tempting a treatment may look or how impressive an authority may seem. If Marshall finds the study utterly faulty, that’s certainly his prerogative and as I said, I agree there are problems with it. But there’s a lot to infer about a person who purportedly is interested in seeing CFS patients get better, yet who has nothing to say about the larger potential of this study, or the publicity, to positively affect people with CFS. Is he concerned about patients, or about the possible loss of his patients to a test or treatment that can be easily proven with double-blind clinical trials? His dismissive defensiveness is unseemly in someone who’s allegedly on our side, and I hope anyone considering his treatment takes this into account.

So, no, I am not heralding a cure, or anything like a cure. But to borrow some Christian vernacular, I am really happy to witness all this spreading of the good news. It should give us hope – not crazy, unrealistic hope, but well founded hope that there are people out there working to find parts of the puzzle. And hope that some people’s minds may be changed when stories like this come out. I’m a skeptic, but in this I believe.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Heightened awareness

I’ve been thinking lately about the concept of awareness. This is a word that anyone with a chronic or serious illness ends up hearing or using a lot. There are days or weeks, charity events, websites, blogs, and forums dedicated to raising awareness of this illness or that. Often in these cases “awareness” includes money to be spent on research or treatment, but my thoughts about this term go beyond the financial. Three particular instances have given me a lot to mull over.

parkingSeptember 14-20 was “National Invisible Chronic Illness Awareness Week.” (How are people with chronic fatigue meant to read to the end of that title without falling asleep?) When I first heard of this, I thought how wonderful, a week dedicated to the problems faced by people with invisible illnesses, something one of my favorite forums, But You Don’t Look Sick, is also all about. I read some excellent — and secular — articles on the site pertaining exactly to my experiences, such as this one about parking in disabled spots when you’re not obviously a gimp. (I use a cane now, but I still find myself affecting a limp I don’t have when I leave or approach my space.)

But look more closely at the site and you will see a few mentions of Christian resources. It turns out the week was created by the founder of Rest Ministries, which identifies itself as “a Christian organization that serves the chronically ill through a variety of programs and resources.” Now don’t misunderstand: I have no problem with the existence or mission of Rest Ministries. I appreciate anyone, religious or otherwise, who feels moved to help those who need it. But being both Jewish and atheist, I feel doubly disenfranchised by this site. I couldn’t bring myself to participate in Invisible Illness Week, and possibly they lost other non-Christian or non-theist people who were similarly turned off. I don’t like that the Christian connection is not made clear, but rather insinuated in various points on the site, nor is there any balancing message of inclusion towards non-Christians. My several inquiries as to this situation received no response.

“It doesn’t really matter because they’re spreading good information,” I’ve been told. It’s true that they are, and to some extent I agree that it doesn’t matter. But awareness campaigns that do not explicitly include the wide range of people whose lives are touched by illness do a disservice to those they could be helping, including shooing away people like me who would otherwise be moved to help with the campaign.

More: Are we helping or harming?

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon