Monthly Archives: February 2010

Weekend sendoff: skeptical yummies

There were a few things this week that made me a happy skeptic. What say we check them out?

On Monday, the U.K.’s Science and Technology Select Committee delivered a death blow to homeopathy by releasing a report that concludes the National Health Service should not fund it, nor should the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) continue to license homeopathic products. I don’t normally get this type of news outside of the skeptical community, but this time I had all kinds of people sending me links to the story. (Thanks, everyone!) I like this summation by Martin Robbins, who is part of the 10:23 campaign. I look forward to potential ripple effects as other governments and medical agencies reconsider the role of homeopathy in healthcare. Which is to say, it hasn’t got one.

I was also very gratified to see a Science-Based Medicine column by Dr. Harriet Hall, the SkepDoc, about the CFS-XMRV situation. I had written to her asking whether she might look into it, and I appreciate her take on it. Naturally it doesn’t come without controversy — for example, she defends Dr. Wallace Sampson in the comments, whose column about CFS leaves a great deal to be desired — but I love seeing caution urged on this matter in a reasonable way by a respected scientist. At this point I no longer have any hope that the CFIDS Association of America is going to provide this for us; they seem to have no interest in reminding patients how science works. These are patients who, for example, believe that getting tested for XMRV is going to contribute to the body of scientific knowledge about it. And as a response, the CAA provides yet more articles, webinars, and interviews about XMRV. Not helpful.

Lastly, registration for The Amazing Meeting 8 in Las Vegas opened today. This is, as others have said, the “Woodstock for skeptics” and I am over-the-moon excited that Paul and I will be attending this year. It takes place pretty close to the first anniversary of this blog, and I can think of no better way to celebrate. I can’t wait to meet everyone — if you’re going, be sure to say hi to the gal with the rainbow cane!

I send you off with something maybe not as fun as a musical number, but more thematically appropriate: an excerpt of Dr. Hall at last year’s TAM 7, speaking about vaccines.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Maybe Egon was right

Janine Melnitz: I bet you like to read a lot, too.
Dr. Egon Spengler: Print is dead.

Although I crushed hard on Egon back in the day (oh let’s face it, I still do), his dismissal of the printed word always lost me. What did that mean, anyway? I loved to read, and so did almost everyone I knew, and didn’t scientists have to read a lot? The joke went over my 11-year-old head, but I did start considering what it might be like to collect spores, mold, and fungus.

Now that Dr. Spengler’s statement is even more apt today, I’m also finding lately that my usual voracious appetite for books has waned alarmingly. Besides the usual collection of books I’ve had for years and haven’t gotten around to — you have one too, right? — I have a stack of new books I really want to read, and just don’t have the motivation to pick up right now. Richard Dawkins and Terry Pratchett are sitting around on my bedside table, wondering why they aren’t getting any action. So to speak.

As far as nonfiction goes, these days I do so much reading about science and skepticism online (not to mention writing and editing) that it’s almost like a job, or more accurately like throwing myself into a degree program. Every day I decide “this is the day I start The Demon-Haunted World” is also a day where I end up reading pages and pages of skeptical news and blogs. The Internet is a distraction, yes, but I don’t feel like I’m wasting my time as I’m learning immense amounts, and loving it. But there’s only so much I can study anymore — that capacity got nerfed as well — so instead of kicking back with Carl when I take a break from the net, I go looking for escapism.

So why don’t I pick up that novel instead, and vanish into some excellent storytelling? Because I’m finding it elsewhere at the moment. I’ve waxed rhapsodic about Dragon Age: Origins previously, and since then I’ve also restarted Mass Effect. Bioware, the company that makes these games, is renowned for the world-building, character development, and storytelling that goes into them. Ferelden and the Systems Alliance are brought to incredibly vivid life with masterful voice acting and compelling plots, and while the games change depending on your actions, they are no mere choose-your-own-adventures. Little moments, like Alistair interrupting an important scene to wonder why I never told him I’d been betrothed once (awkward!), or an assassin smoothly slipping out of the shot when Shepard is on TV, truly allow you to feel that you’re not just plugging into a predetermined pathway, but that your words, actions, and relationships have true consequences in the world. And the codices! Between DA and ME, there’s a novel’s worth of reading I have yet to do right there.

The games aren’t distracting me from reading purely because I’m spending my free time on them, but rather because they deeply satisfy my craving for great storytelling. And if it weren’t for the games, I’d still have these comics that are so ridiculously good, they achieve the same thing. I was never much for them, especially the superhero genre, but in college I had to read Maus for a freshman lit class, and my views on graphic novels were blown all to hell. Later, my friend Teena, who used to work for Dark Horse Comics, pushed The Dark Knight into my hands and said “Just read it.” She was my official Comics Arbiter until Paul took over that position, and I credit them both with igniting my interest.

I have picky and eclectic tastes in comics. I love both Persepolis and Owly, and I especially get a kick out of stories that turn the superhero genre on its ear. For example, I can’t get enough of The Boys, which surprised the hell out of someone once who told me “I didn’t think girls read that one.” Yeah, it’s off-the-charts raunchy, violent, and offensive, but hilariously so, and the characters leap right off the page out of a story that just keeps getting deeper and twistier. On the other end of the spectrum, I recently read the entire four-issue run of Beasts of Burden, as well as the anthology stories that are available online. It’s sort of like Buffy the Vampire Slayer as enacted by anthropomorphized neighborhood pets; a seemingly over-cute concept, but in fact it has beautiful art, compelling characters, and stories that — well, I don’t want to give anything away, but I’m not sure I’ll ever forget issue #2 (“Lost”).

As a lifelong lover of books, I can’t help feeling guilty that I’m getting the goods elsewhere, but I also realize how silly this is when there’s so much good fiction and nonfiction in other media. However, Mort isn’t going to go unread forever, nor is The Selfish Gene. I’ll get back to all those shiny, delicious-smelling pages soon. Print isn’t dead to me…for now, it’s just taking a little nap.

(Yes, I know this is the second blog post in as many weeks to reference Ghostbusters. Back off, man — I’m a skeptic.)

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Weekend sendoff: Not to belabor the point, but…

I did a lot of reading and writing this week, so this will be a sendoff “lite.” Mostly I was taking a glimpse down the XMRV rabbit hole, and I can report that there is one hell of an anti-Wonderland down there. Science and skepticism need not apply; only a fanatical devotion to the promise of an XMRV-CFS connection and snarling distrust of those who suggest that there isn’t one yet.

Madness? This is Wonderland! Now take your antiretroviral meds.

I’m exaggerating (slightly) for effect, of course, and leaving out the rational patients with a skeptical attitude who I have encountered, some of whom have been kind enough to comment here. But generally speaking, it’s getting very, very deep. The CFIDS Association has clearly decided that XMRV hype is the best way to drum up research dollars, and I can’t say I necessarily disagree with that strategy since I want those dollars to come in as well. However, as a result, they are failing badly at patient advocacy, claiming they “advise caution” while continuing to beat the XMRV drum. Since I wrote my second post about this a couple of weeks ago, a second U.K. study has failed to identify XMRV in a cohort of CFS patients. Suzanne Vernon, Ph.D., who is scientific director of the CFIDS Association, has gone to great pains to explain this failure, in a note remarkable for its total lack of any mention of the possibility that there may be nothing there to find. So much for “caution.”

Happier stuff from the week included a profile of me on Skepchick, which kicked off their “Skeptic Next Door” series. And I watched a lot of curling.

I’m sending you off with a musical number from the original The Singing Detective, with Michael Gambon. If you thought the hospital fantasy sequences in Scrubs were bizarre, you should really check this show out.

Post to Twitter Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon